Process engineering
Mapping, measuring and redesigning work processes end to end.
- BPMN 2.0
- SIPOC
- Value Stream Mapping
- Lean
- Process Mining
KO AI engineers and consultants rebuild your organization's work processes into leaner, AI-based processes, inside your organization, on your data, and measured against a business KPI.
AI / ML systems in production
New AI-based processes deployed at clients
AI agents live in production
Hours of AI consulting for companies
Last updated
Forward deployed engineering (FDE) is advanced process engineering that turns legacy business processes into AI-based processes and deploys them inside the organization. A team of engineers and consultants works with the people who do the work, on the real data and systems, and owns both the business case and the build.
KO AI is a pioneer of FDE in Israel: as of September 2026 our team has put 40+ AI / ML systems into production and deployed 500+ new AI-based processes at clients. We combine process engineering with data, AI and ML, and we work on-site with clients in Israel and Europe from our offices in Tel Aviv, Prague and Porto.
The same team that maps the process designs it, builds it, connects it to your core systems and stays with it in production. Success is a business KPI agreed before the build starts, not a number of features.
A forward deployed engineer works where four disciplines meet. It is a rare combination: senior business judgement and deep technical skill in the same team, sitting with the people who run the process.
Mapping, measuring and redesigning work processes end to end.
Capacity, bottlenecks, cost and service levels, as they look on the floor.
Leading change in a large organization: stakeholders, risk, timelines and adoption.
Models, data and engineering that hold up in production, not only in a demo.
FDE starts with the business process, not the technology. We measure the process as it runs today, redesign it around what AI and ML can do, and deploy it until the numbers move.
We learn the process as it actually happens, not as the procedure says it does.
Interviews and observation with the people who do the work, mapping every step, decision and hand-off between teams.
Logs and data from CRM, ERP and operational systems, to find the real path every case takes.
Cycle time, cost per case, error and rework rates, waiting time and SLA compliance.
We rank the improvement points by business value and by how realistic they are to deliver.
Steps where cases wait, get keyed in twice or come back for correction. Cycle time is set by the bottleneck, not the average.
Recurring decisions that follow rules or patterns in the data, and fit a business rule, an ML model or a language model.
A priority map that ties every improvement to ROI, risk and time to deliver.
We don't add a tool to an old process. We rebuild the process.
Steps that disappear, steps that move to deterministic automation, and steps where AI adds real value.
For every node: who decides (a rule, a model or a person), on what data, at what confidence threshold, and what happens below it.
Exactly where human judgement stays, and the controls around it.
KO AI engineers build the new process in your environment.
An orchestrated workflow, AI and ML models, and connections to your core systems, under your security policies and permissions.
Training for the teams, new working routines, and support until the new process becomes habit.
The new process is measured against the baseline and improves over time.
Comparison with the baseline, model performance and drift monitoring, and regular reporting to management.
The right model for each task and control of usage costs, so AI spend doesn't eat the savings.
A good process is a chain of steps and decision nodes. At each node we decide who decides: a business rule, an ML model, a language model or a person, and at what confidence threshold. Select a node to see how it works.
Supplier invoice processing: a deterministic process with AI components at the nodes
01 Invoice intake · Deterministic automation
02 Data extraction · Language model (LLM)
03 Three-way match · Business rule (DMN)
04 Anomaly detection · ML model
05 Threshold routing · Business rule (DMN)
06 Exception approval · Human decision
07 Posting and payment · Deterministic automation
An illustration, not a client result. In every project the nodes, thresholds and controls are set from the organization's own data and risks.
| Component | When it fits | Cost per decision | Explainability | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business rule (DMN) | Clear, stable rules: thresholds, matching, permissions | Close to zero | Full | Instant |
| ML model | Patterns in historical data: forecasting, risk scoring, anomalies | Low | Partial (feature importance) | Milliseconds |
| Language model (LLM) | Unstructured text and documents: reading, extraction, summarising, classification | Variable, by tokens | Needs source citation and controls | Seconds |
| Human decision | Judgement, exceptions, accountability and regulation | The highest | Full, when documented | Minutes to days |
Autonomous agents attract a lot of productivity fantasies. In practice, most of the efficiency comes from placing AI components inside well-designed, deterministic processes.
| Criterion | Autonomous agent | Engineered AI workflow |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | A path that changes on every run, with extra steps and retries. | A fixed, short path. AI runs only at the node where it adds value. |
| Cost | Hard to predict: every step is another model call. | Predictable and measurable per case, including token cost. |
| Control | Hard to explain why a decision was made, or what happened on the way. | Every node has a threshold, a fallback and a log. You know what happened and why. |
| Scale | A small error is multiplied across thousands of runs. | The same quality at ten cases and at ten thousand. |
| Value | Impressive in a demo, hard to prove in production. | Measured against a business KPI from day one. |
We use autonomy where it earns its place: in an open, well-defined step, inside a controlled process, with limits, permissions and tests.
Anthropic: Building effective agents Gartner: over 40% of agentic AI projects predicted to be cancelled by end of 2027
FDE doesn't bolt a chatbot onto an existing process. It rebuilds the process: AI components do the repetitive work, and people decide where judgement is needed.
An illustration, not a client result. In a real project we measure the actual times in the first week and calculate the savings on the organization's own numbers.
Every FDE project is measured against business metrics agreed before the build, not against a count of features.
From receiving a request or case to closing it, including waiting time between teams.
Work hours and direct cost per unit of work, including the cost of model usage.
Error rate, rework, and the exceptions that reach a control step.
The volume a team handles without adding headcount.
Meeting service targets for internal and external customers.
Faster, data-based decisions, each documented and explainable.
In 2026 the largest AI and cloud companies set up dedicated FDE units, because a good model turned out not to be enough. Someone has to put it into the real work of the organization.
OpenAI launched a dedicated company for embedding forward deployed engineers in enterprises, with an investment of about $4 billion and about 150 FDEs from day one.
AWS invested $1 billion in a unit that embeds engineering teams with customers, works on their data and infrastructure, and leaves them self-sufficient at the end.
When everyone offers FDE, the question is who sits across the table from you.
AWS, Anthropic, OpenAI and Microsoft all offer FDE today, around their own platforms. Our FDE is multi-system and vendor-agnostic: we bring the most effective solution for each process, with no tie to any one vendor.
We are an official partner of AWS and Microsoft and part of Anthropic's partner network. Partnership means deep knowledge and the ability to combine technologies, not a preference for any vendor.
Real experience designing, measuring and optimizing processes. We start from the process, not the tool.
We have run units inside large organizations and made the decisions ourselves. We know how a process looks to the person accountable for it.
Hands-on experience selecting, adapting and evaluating AI and ML models, not only using tools.
We work in international applied research in the field, and bring methods into projects that have been tested outside the organization too.
On-site with clients in Israel and Europe. We know the systems and the regulation you work under, from GDPR and the EU AI Act to DORA in financial services.



ANTHROPICFour ways to bring AI into an organization. The difference is where you start, who owns the result, and when you see it.
| Criterion | FDE (KO AI) | Cloud / model vendor FDE | Traditional consulting | Software house |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What you get | A process that runs in production and measures a result | A production solution, on the vendor's platform | A recommendations document and a roadmap | Software built to a specification |
| Vendor preference | Agnostic: the best-fitting solution, from any vendor | Built on the vendor's own technology | Varies | The house stack |
| Where the team works | Inside the organization, with the people who do the work | Inside the organization, around the platform | In workshops and interviews | At the supplier, through a contact person |
| Starting point | The business process and its metrics | The platform's capabilities | Strategy and organization design | A specification the organization wrote |
| Who owns the result | The same team, from mapping to production | The vendor's team, with a focus on platform adoption | The organization, after the engagement | The organization, after hand-over |
| How success is measured | A business KPI set on day one | A business KPI plus platform adoption | Satisfaction with the deliverable | Meeting the spec and the schedule |
| Pace | A process in a week, a decision system in a month, a unit in 3 months | Depends on the engagement | Months before anything is built | Depends on the spec, usually long |
One engineered process in a week. From there the pace compounds: a decision-making system in a month, and a whole unit in three months.
A day for diagnosis, about three days for design, a few days to build, then experiments on real data until the target value is reached.
Several processes joined into one system: decision nodes with ML and language models, confidence thresholds, exceptions routed to the right people, and full control.
Dozens of new processes replacing many dozens of old ones, with monitoring, model-cost management and an internal team running the unit.
Map the process on the floor and in the data, measure the current state and set one numeric target.
The optimal process, its decision nodes, the right component for each node, and the controls.
The workflow, AI and ML components and system connections, in the organization's environment.
Runs on real data, measured against the target and tuned until the value is reached.
A complex process? We split it into sub-processes, and each one goes through the same sprint.
Mid-size and large companies with a high-volume process, repetitive manual work, and data that already sits in their systems, even if it isn't tidy.
Intake, checking and processing of requests, documents and cases that repeat hundreds of times a day.
Handling repeat requests, summarising calls and routing to the right agent.
Reconciliations, quotes, controls and reports that come back every month.
Contract review, regulatory monitoring (EU AI Act, DORA, GDPR) and documentation, with the source cited.
ML and forecasting models wired into the process instead of staying on a dashboard.
Recruiting, onboarding and internal knowledge assistants that answer from your own procedures.
KO AI figures as of September 2026. Industries: Financial Services · Insurance · Software & SaaS · Mobility & Automotive · Healthcare & Life Sciences · Manufacturing & Industrial.
AI / ML systems in production
New AI-based processes deployed at clients
Projects delivered
Hours of AI consulting for companies
Where AI creates value, the roadmap and governance, from the boardroom to the model layer.
Enterprise AI agents, custom AI/ML and the infrastructure to run them in production.
Training as part of adoption, by role and department, so new processes become habit.
Automating the processes you already have, and knowing when a process needs FDE instead.
A 30-minute call with an engineer who will work on the project, not a salesperson.